GMRES and the conjugate gradient method. For these methods the number of steps needed to obtain the exact solution is so large that an approximation is accepted in the same manner as for an iterative method. Furthermore, continuous problems must sometimes be replaced by a discrete problem whose solution is known to approximate that of the continuous problem; this process is called ' discretization '.

For example, the solution of a differential equation is a function. This function must be represented by a finite amount of data, for instance by its value at a finite number of points at its domain, even though this domain is a continuum. The study of errors forms an important part of numerical analysis. There are several ways in which error can be introduced in the solution of the problem.

Round-off errors arise because it is impossible to represent all real numbers exactly on a machine with finite memory which is what all practical digital computers are. Truncation errors are committed when an iterative method is terminated or a mathematical procedure is approximated, and the approximate solution differs from the exact solution. Similarly, discretization induces a discretization error because the solution of the discrete problem does not coincide with the solution of the continuous problem. Therefore, there is a truncation error of 0. Once an error is generated, it will generally propagate through the calculation.

The truncation error is created when a mathematical procedure is approximated.

## Monte Carlo method

To integrate a function exactly it is required to find the sum of infinite trapezoids, but numerically only the sum of only finite trapezoids can be found, and hence the approximation of the mathematical procedure. Similarly, to differentiate a function, the differential element approaches zero but numerically only a finite value of the differential element can be chosen.

Numerical stability is a notion in numerical analysis. An algorithm is called 'numerically stable' if an error, whatever its cause, does not grow to be much larger during the calculation. This happens if the problem is ' well-conditioned ', meaning that the solution changes by only a small amount if the problem data are changed by a small amount. To the contrary, if a problem is 'ill-conditioned', then any small error in the data will grow to be a large error.

Both the original problem and the algorithm used to solve that problem can be 'well-conditioned' or 'ill-conditioned', and any combination is possible.

## Cats, Qubits, and Teleportation: The Spooky World of Quantum Computation Applications (Part 3)

So an algorithm that solves a well-conditioned problem may be either numerically stable or numerically unstable. An art of numerical analysis is to find a stable algorithm for solving a well-posed mathematical problem. For instance, computing the square root of 2 which is roughly 1. Hence, the Babylonian method is numerically stable, while Method X is numerically unstable. Interpolation: Observing that the temperature varies from 20 degrees Celsius at to 14 degrees at , a linear interpolation of this data would conclude that it was 17 degrees at and Regression: In linear regression, given n points, a line is computed that passes as close as possible to those n points.

Differential equation: If fans are set up to blow air from one end of the room to the other and then a feather isdropped into the wind, what happens? The feather will follow the air currents, which may be very complex. One approximation is to measure the speed at which the air is blowing near the feather every second, and advance the simulated feather as if it were moving in a straight line at that same speed for one second, before measuring the wind speed again.

This is called the Euler method for solving an ordinary differential equation. One of the simplest problems is the evaluation of a function at a given point. The most straightforward approach, of just plugging in the number in the formula is sometimes not very efficient. For polynomials, a better approach is using the Horner scheme , since it reduces the necessary number of multiplications and additions.

Generally, it is important to estimate and control round-off errors arising from the use of floating point arithmetic. Interpolation solves the following problem: given the value of some unknown function at a number of points, what value does that function have at some other point between the given points? Extrapolation is very similar to interpolation, except that now the value of the unknown function at a point which is outside the given points must be found.

Regression is also similar, but it takes into account that the data is imprecise. Given some points, and a measurement of the value of some function at these points with an error , the unknown function can be found. The least squares -method is one way to achieve this. Another fundamental problem is computing the solution of some given equation.

Two cases are commonly distinguished, depending on whether the equation is linear or not.

Much effort has been put in the development of methods for solving systems of linear equations. Standard direct methods, i. Iterative methods such as the Jacobi method , Gauss—Seidel method , successive over-relaxation and conjugate gradient method are usually preferred for large systems. General iterative methods can be developed using a matrix splitting. Root-finding algorithms are used to solve nonlinear equations they are so named since a root of a function is an argument for which the function yields zero.

If the function is differentiable and the derivative is known, then Newton's method is a popular choice. Linearization is another technique for solving nonlinear equations. Several important problems can be phrased in terms of eigenvalue decompositions or singular value decompositions. For instance, the spectral image compression algorithm [3] is based on the singular value decomposition. The corresponding tool in statistics is called principal component analysis. Optimization problems ask for the point at which a given function is maximized or minimized. Often, the point also has to satisfy some constraints.

The field of optimization is further split in several subfields, depending on the form of the objective function and the constraint. For instance, linear programming deals with the case that both the objective function and the constraints are linear. A famous method in linear programming is the simplex method.

### mathematics and statistics online

The method of Lagrange multipliers can be used to reduce optimization problems with constraints to unconstrained optimization problems. Numerical integration, in some instances also known as numerical quadrature , asks for the value of a definite integral. Popular methods use one of the Newton—Cotes formulas like the midpoint rule or Simpson's rule or Gaussian quadrature. These methods rely on a "divide and conquer" strategy, whereby an integral on a relatively large set is broken down into integrals on smaller sets.

In higher dimensions, where these methods become prohibitively expensive in terms of computational effort, one may use Monte Carlo or quasi-Monte Carlo methods see Monte Carlo integration , or, in modestly large dimensions, the method of sparse grids. Numerical analysis is also concerned with computing in an approximate way the solution of differential equations, both ordinary differential equations and partial differential equations.

Partial differential equations are solved by first discretizing the equation, bringing it into a finite-dimensional subspace. This can be done by a finite element method , a finite difference method, or particularly in engineering a finite volume method. The theoretical justification of these methods often involves theorems from functional analysis. This reduces the problem to the solution of an algebraic equation. Since the late twentieth century, most algorithms are implemented in a variety of programming languages. The Netlib repository contains various collections of software routines for numerical problems, mostly in Fortran and C.

Performance varies widely: while vector and matrix operations are usually fast, scalar loops may vary in speed by more than an order of magnitude. Many computer algebra systems such as Mathematica also benefit from the availability of arbitrary-precision arithmetic which can provide more accurate results. Also, any spreadsheet software can be used to solve simple problems relating to numerical analysis. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

It has been suggested that Numerical method be merged into this article. Discuss Proposed since January This article includes a list of references , but its sources remain unclear because it has insufficient inline citations. Please help to improve this article by introducing more precise citations. November Learn how and when to remove this template message. Main article: Mathematical optimization.

Main article: Numerical integration. Main articles: Numerical ordinary differential equations and Numerical partial differential equations. Main articles: List of numerical analysis software and Comparison of numerical analysis software. Golub, Gene H.

Van Loan Matrix Computations 3rd ed. Johns Hopkins University Press. Higham, Nicholas J. Accuracy and Stability of Numerical Algorithms.

- Who? What? Why? Where?: The Guardian Book of Questions.
- Monkey!
- The Story of Flight.
- The Secret Pilgrim.
- New Methods of Thought and Procedure: Contributions to the Symposium on Methodologies!
- Introduction?

Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics. Hildebrand, F. Introduction to Numerical Analysis 2nd ed. Leader, Jeffery J. Numerical Analysis and Scientific Computation. Addison Wesley. At first glance, unstructured search may seem to have few applications. That mean we can search for the solution to any problem, as long as the answer can be easily verified.

There are also intriguing possibilities for things other than cracking codes. In many cases this is good enough. Finally, because they can consider a range of possibilities, quantum computers have a natural application for complex modelling problems. Modelling financial data or risk is one potential application, and airline logistics is another one. Quantum computers were first proposed when physicists realised that their most powerful computers could not simulate even small quantum systems.

At the moment, the best known simulation, by an IBM team , can model 56 particles, but this required some very clever mathematics, several days of computation, and 3 terabytes of memory. Because more complex systems of particles cannot be simulated, it can be very difficult to understand them or make predictions about their behaviour. This hampers progress in a number of domains, such as low-temperature physics, material science, and drug design. In general, there are two main plays for quantum; cost reduction for existing computations which are currently expensive, and actually doing calculations which are currently so expensive or slow they're effectively impossible.

The same factors which make quantum theory so startling also make quantum computers very difficult to implement in practice: quantum phenomena don't manifest themselves in everyday life. Although quantum phenomena can be observed in the lab, it generally requires extreme conditions - individual isolated photons or particles, a vacuum, and temperatures a few thousandths of a degree above absolute zero.

These conditions are challenging to achieve, but with enough resources and the benefit of modern science, they are technically possible.

However, there's also a more philosophical challenge. The reason everyday things don't seem to be quantum is that they're macroscopic; quantum effects only manifest themselves at a tiny scale. When particles interact with other particles, they start to become part of a macroscopic - that is, classical - system. For a quantum computer to stay 'quantum', therefore, it has to be totally isolated from any interaction with the outside world. This is a bit of a paradox, because any 'wall' or 'barrier' is itself part of the outside world, and 'being contained by the wall' is itself an interaction.

And it gets worse! Even if perfect isolation was technically possible, it wouldn't be what we wanted: we need to be able to interact with the system at the beginning of a computation to set the initial state of the bits write to the quantum memory , and then interact with it again at the end of the calculation to measure their state and get the answer read the quantum memory. In other words, we need to be able to turn on and off the connection to the outside world, and turn and off the very quantum-ness of the computer.

Current quantum computer implementations do seem to be overcoming these barriers. However, they can do so only for a very short amount of time. As of last year, a quantum computer could do calculations for about 0.

All proposed quantum computers work by either isolating individual photons, or isolating individual atomic particles. Qubit implementations tend to be as small as possible to minimise decoherence. Once we have a fault-tolerant universal quantum computer with thousands of qubits which is years away , public-key factoring-based cryptography algorithms, such as RSA, will no longer be secure. This is just as well, given how important public-key cryptography is to most of the internet, particularly online commerce. A number of possible schemes exist, including "lattice-based" cryptography protocols.

Realising quantum advantage will require further developments in material science.

**see**

## Methods and Applications of Error-Free Computation - jedexicenohy.tk

Businesses, academic institutions, and governments are continuing to push up the qubit count, and quality. As quantum computers get bigger, the preferred architecture will probably shift from homogeneous to a modular one. Rather than every qubit being connected to every other one, scalability will be achieved by grouping qubits into isolated sub-units. Just like with microservices, communication between the modules will be necessary, and will probably require special communication centres in the architecture. Either physical qubits will need to be moved around the network, or photons mixed in with the physical qubits to act as quantum-capable communication gateways.

All of the current quantum computers need to be run at operating temperatures of around degrees C to protect the delicate quantum states from noise. As well as being expensive, this kind of extreme refrigeration is difficult and bulky. Finding a way to do quantum computation at room temperature is an area of ongoing research. In , a Canadian research team showed that quantum states could survive at room temperature for 39 minutes , which would be enough for many computations.

Unfortunately, that particular system still needed to be cooled to 4 Kelvin in order to set the initial state or read out the state, so it still needed a huge fridge, and was only room temperature for part of the time. Even when running colder than deep space, current quantum systems do suffer from significant levels of noise and errors. How to make quantum computers fault-tolerant is an area of active research. Classical computers are also subject to physical errors, but fixing those errors is fairly straightforward.

The only kind of an error that a single bit can have is a bit-flip. This can then be used to catch cases where a qubit is in the wrong state, and correct it by flipping it from up to down, or adjusting the phase. Error-correction protocols replace physical qubits with logical ones, where each logical qubit is made up of several physical ones.

Even if the physical qubits are fragile, the logical qubit can stay robust. The downside is that implementing this kind of fault tolerance involves a lot of information redundancy, and that means a lot of overhead. A quantum error-tolerance protocol needs at least five physical qubits per logical qubit. It seems likely that practical fault tolerance will be a at least a decade away. One of the interesting questions at the moment is how to do useful quantum computation without fault tolerance.

For some computations an approximate answer is good enough, so quantum computation is most likely to be useful for this category of problems, in the near term. For example, some quantum chemistry problems are so hard that an approximate quantum computer could significantly improve the accuracy of calculations. Increasing the number of qubits does not improve a quantum computer if the error rate also goes up. Given the cost, size, and physical delicacy of quantum computers, they're a perfect fit for the 'pay per use' cloud consumption model.

Since the computers need to be kept at temperatures below a Kelvin, the quantum cloud is definitely the coldest cloud, and makes the cooling requirements of most data centres look trivial. It's likely that more cloud providers will start offering quantum capabilities built into their current clouds. Conceptual Compression is a shrinking in the conceptual overhead of some programming tasks, so that developers need to understand far fewer concepts to take advantage of a technology.

Another way of thinking of it is as a shift from low-level abstractions to higher-level abstractions - and, critically, making these abstractions non-leaky. Conceptual compression has been a steady trend in our industry from its earliest days. We have seen a shift from assembly languages to higher-level languages, the introduction of garbage collection to reduce the development cost and functional impact of memory management, the replacement of raw SQL calls with ORM, the introduction of highly accessible machine learning libraries, the replacement of hardware with IaaS, and the replacement of individual systems with PaaS.

There is a similar trend in quantum programming. Fifteen years ago, anyone wanting to implement a quantum algorithm would need to implement the gate sequences directly at the hardware-level. Now, tools such as the QISkit quantum SDK allow quantum programs to be written, and then compiled for execution on hardware. However, even with the python version, someone wanting to take advantage of quantum capabilities needs to understand quantum computation fundamentals. QISkit programs are written in terms of quantum gates and registers. At the moment, the mental file-size required to write an effective quantum-based algorithm is still pretty big.

### mathematics and statistics online

It seems clear that, over time, quantum developers will be able to take advantage of more high-level abstractions. In the future, we will almost certainly see the development of quantum libraries. We may even see the elimination of quantum libraries; that is, if quantum hardware becomes ubiquitous enough, quantum libraries may be replaced by general-purpose optimisation libraries which automatically choose which parts of a given calculation should be done in a quantum way, and which in a classical way.

This is similar to how modern machine learning libraries will interrogate system hardware and run GPU-optimised versions of calculations where GPUs are available, so that machine-learning developers do not need to think at the GPU-level. Quantum advantage is defined as the ability of quantum computers to solve problems that classical computers cannot, for a practical purpose. Quantum advantage will have been achieved when quantum computers are large enough and robust enough to be useful.

Although no one can predict exactly when we will see quantum advantage, recent progress has been so impressive that it seems likely that the milestone is inevitable.